That headline is a quote from a very encouraging common-sense interview that was done by the Wall Street Journal a few days ago about the mother-daughter tension over modesty and sexuality. WSJ reporter Kelsey Hubbard interviewed author Jennifer Moses about the tension, regret, and misgivings mothers can feel about the way their daughters are dressing--and the implications of early sexualization via fashion and media. It's refreshing to see that people with different theologies and worldviews are discerning the problems of the pornographic culture in which we live. As Jennifer Moses says, "It's a debased, cheap culture because sex sells." Check out this five-minute interview below:
I posted the video first, because I think it is meatier than the essay Jennifer Moses wrote. But both are worth your time. Here's an excerpt from the essay:
All of which brings me to a question: Why do so many of us not only permit our teenage daughters to dress like this—like prostitutes, if we're being honest with ourselves—but pay for them to do it with our AmEx cards?
I posed this question to a friend whose teenage daughter goes to an all-girls private school in New York. "It isn't that different from when we were kids," she said. "The girls in the sexy clothes are the fast girls. They'll have Facebook pictures of themselves opening a bottle of Champagne, like Paris Hilton. And sometimes the moms and dads are out there contributing to it, shopping with them, throwing them parties at clubs. It's almost like they're saying, 'Look how hot my daughter is.'" But why? "I think it's a bonding thing," she said. "It starts with the mommy-daughter manicure and goes on from there."
I have a different theory. It has to do with how conflicted my own generation of women is about our own past, when many of us behaved in ways that we now regret. A woman I know, with two mature daughters, said, "If I could do it again, I wouldn't even have slept with my own husband before marriage. Sex is the most powerful thing there is, and our generation, what did we know?"
We are the first moms in history to have grown up with widely available birth control, the first who didn't have to worry about getting knocked up. We were also the first not only to be free of old-fashioned fears about our reputations but actually pressured by our peers and the wider culture to find our true womanhood in the bedroom. Not all of us are former good-time girls now drowning in regret—I know women of my generation who waited until marriage—but that's certainly the norm among my peers.
So here we are, the feminist and postfeminist and postpill generation. We somehow survived our own teen and college years (except for those who didn't), and now, with the exception of some Mormons, evangelicals and Orthodox Jews, scads of us don't know how to teach our own sons and daughters not to give away their bodies so readily. We're embarrassed, and we don't want to be, God forbid, hypocrites.
I have sympathy for this tension, even though I don't have teenage children. My prayer is that the adults (both moms and dads) will take the long-range view and not lose steam in guiding their teens toward modesty, self-restraint and self-respect. That the wisdom gleaned from hindsight (see the sentence I bolded above) will be shared liberally and without fears of hypocrisy with the young adults in our midst.
Straight, no chaser. Thanks for telling it like it is, Carolyn, and for the included video and Jennifer Moses quote.
Posted by: John Rowland | March 23, 2011 at 05:32 PM
I just did a series of articles on modesty and sexuality in teen girls, so this is kind of a timely cap for me on all of it. I push modesty with my (14-year-old) daughter. I've often sent her upstairs to change. It's funny how I've never backed down, and now she's starting to make good decisions with modesty in mind. She's appalled at friends' clothes and will tell me about it. Children have more sense that we give them credit for, a lot of times. We shouldn't be afraid to educate them.
Hallee
Posted by: Hallee the Homemaker | March 25, 2011 at 06:22 AM
This article perfectly sets up an obviousism but then, as our godless liberal media is wont to do, utterly shuns it: herein lies one of the primary protective values of male leadership (yes, authority) in the family.
What woman does not want her daughter to be radiant, captivating, beautiful, attractive to both the boys and girls around her, cute.... and what woman typically would NOT work toward that end?? This is naturally feminine mothering. It would be unnatural, even un-Godly, for her to think: "I want to maintain my daughter homely, reclusive."
But she needs to submit herself to her husband for that elusive balance, for which this article so desperately clamors.
Most men - I daresay even non-Christian men - naturally know when to say "enough" when it comes to their blossoming daughters, or "this is appropriate for her guy friends to see but this is not!" HE well knows how the budding young masculinity around that beautiful young lady thinks, and plans. The mother and daughter in their God-given absence of masculinity, their innocence of femininity, usually do not.
Here, at the heart of this article, is a blatant demonstration of Biblical truth. A mother's submissive assent to the value of her husband's leadership is not a curse, it's the cure.
Posted by: KC-ALB | March 29, 2011 at 07:59 PM
It would be nice to teach our daughters that our sexuality is a good thing, when it is not exploited and perverted. Our femininity and sexuality speaks to much more than the genitally oriented nature our culture has reduced it to. As Christian moms, we know both the beauty and role God has blessed women with and should encourage young ladies with our own confidence in the gospel. If we can work on their hearts and understanding, they may gain some discernment on their own as they mature and are away from our supervision.
Posted by: Aimee Byrd | March 30, 2011 at 11:03 PM
I thought the original article--and the ensuing discussion--have been VERY interesting. But I hadn't seen the video, till now. Thanks for posting.
Posted by: Anne | April 12, 2011 at 11:06 PM