Friends of mine in a nearby church told me about a great idea to promote friendships between married and single people in their church. This idea would work well in any community, but I'm so glad to see it was the brainchild of a married man who saw the value of creating contexts for people to get to know each other in their local congregation. So I asked Duncan & Rebekah Rein if they would share their story for this blog and they agreed. Below is Duncan's guest post and a request for help to set up other churches to use the same system hospitality system.
***********************
I joined Capitol Hill Baptist Church in Washington, DC, in 1997 when there were only about 100 members and it was quite easy to know everyone in the church. Ten years later, I would attend a members’ meeting and see a bewildering array of new faces joining the church, while also saying goodbye to members who were leaving the area, many of whom had been members for a few years but I had never even met. My wife Rebekah joined the church in early 2008, shortly after our marriage. Rebekah was coming from a much smaller church and also felt a bit overwhelmed by the challenge of getting to know so many new people.
The membership of Capitol Hill Baptist is quite transient. That is a fact of life for a church located six blocks from the Capitol. Senior pastor Mark Dever has used the analogy of “embracing the parade,” loving people while they’re here and equipping them for ministry in a new local church in the event that they move away from the area.
I remembered my years in the church when I was in my 20’s. There were great examples of godly pastors, many of whom were accessible, but it was a bit challenging to get to know older men who were living out their faith in the workplace. However, one family in the church reached out to my roommates and me, inviting us over to dinner on several occasions and even including us as part of their family’s summer vacation at the lake each summer. These acts of hospitality made a big difference for us, as we grew more connected to people who were in a different life stage than we were.
Now, ten years later, I was sure that there must still be other younger members of the church who could benefit from stronger relationships with others outside their peer group. A couple of lunches with some younger members confirmed this anecdotally.
It occurred to both Rebekah and me that we were not doing a great job of “embracing the parade.” Partially, this was due to our selfishness with our time. We’re both introverted, and especially when we were both working long hours, we tended to want to guard our valuable free time. When we did take the initiative to spend time with others, it was typically much easier and much more comfortable to spend time with people we already knew, oftentimes drawing from a circle of friends who had been attending the church for a long time.
However, it appeared to us that there was some inertia that hampered not only our outreach efforts, but the efforts of other married couples who had similar desires and good intentions. With all the new members coming in, how would you even decide who to reach out to? And one-off invitations to people you’ve never talked to before can seem kind of random and out of the blue. Granted, these were small barriers that could be overcome, but in the whirlwind that is life in DC, even small barriers can become significant. We tried to come up with some ideas that would help overcome these structural barriers.
The solution we came up with was quite simple. We’d identify married couples who were interested in building stronger connections with singles in the church and could commit to hosting one dinner per month. And we’d identify singles in the church who were interested in building stronger connections with married couples, and who could commit to attending one dinner per month. People would be asked to commit for a six-month period.
Prior to the beginning of each month, each host couple would receive an email with seven or eight names and email addresses. It would then be up to them to schedule a dinner and invite the names on the list. Each host couple would host a different group of singles each month. The groups of singles would not remain static, but would get mixed up each month, so that over the course of six months, each person would get to know a large number of new people in a relaxed and informal setting.
By providing some centralized organization, we were able to eliminate the barrier of each married couple needing to figure out who they should reach out to, making it easier for them to be consistent and expansive in their outreach efforts. Furthermore, it was encouraging for married couples to know that their efforts each month were being supplemented by the efforts of others, and that each dinner was building, over an extended period of time, into a powerful force for good in the lives of all ministry participants.
We launched this ministry in early 2010. We originally estimated that we’d start with six married couples and 35-40 singles. Instead, we had about 80 singles express interest, and we were able to recruit 12 married couples to serve as hosts.
Since its beginning in early 2010, the ministry seems to have been encouraging for almost everyone involved. We received many notes from singles who appreciated the chance to connect with married couples and learn about God’s work in the lives of people they might not otherwise have come into contact with. It especially seemed to help newer members get plugged into the church more quickly. It helped the church feel a little smaller, both for the singles and for the host couples.
We also received positive feedback from host couples. Rebekah and I hosted a lot of dinners we probably otherwise wouldn’t have were it not for the organization and the accountability that the ministry brought. Not surprisingly, we had many months where work was extremely busy, and without the commitment of having already scheduled a dinner, it is likely that we would not have taken the initiative to try to reach out in hospitality to people we didn’t know. However, we were always extremely happy after the fact that we had pushed through and hosted because we invariably got to know a group of interesting people and enjoyed a rich time of fellowship with brothers and sisters in Christ who we would not have otherwise known.
Rebekah and I had assumed that most of the ministry participants would be young, but we were surprised and encouraged that single members in their 40s and 50s also participated and were able to contribute their wisdom and their perspective.
While the ministry was not intended to be a matchmaking ministry, we did hope to have reasonable gender balance. As things played out, young women in the church were as a group more enthusiastic about the ministry than the young men and signed up at a 3:1 ratio. While we would have liked to have seen more guys in the group, the guys that did participate largely seemed to enjoy the favorable ratio.
We heard persistent rumors that the ministry was an elaborate matchmaking service, and we heard that some guys shied away from it for that reason. The unexciting truth is that we wrote a computer program that generated random sets of names each month. The computer program made sure that a person would not be hosted by the same couple twice within a six-month period, but other than that the invite lists each month were completely random. Of course God is sovereign, even over randomly generated computer programs, and so we can’t deny the possibility that matchmaking could occur, but we did not play any active role, or try to orchestrate any matchmaking. That was not the point of the ministry.
The rotating dinners facilitated a multiplicity of relationships. We had hoped that this would provide the foundation for some new discipling relationships to grow organically. While we don’t have a record of how all the new relationships developed over time, we did receive several individual testimonies that were greatly encouraging. One illustrative example testimony is included below:
Dinner at Justin & Abigail's: I just got back to DC after what I thought was a short trip home to Texas over Memorial Day-- but I had an injury during that time and ended up having to stay home three weeks. This was my first get-together after that time-- I was exhausted, still healing from my injury, and really longing for friendship and connection. Abigail wrote me an e-mail and encouraged me to come. Looking back, this was one of my first times I really felt part of the CHBC fam. I met Leslie (and found we had a mutual friend), and David (and found we had similar heart growth since being at CHBC), and Abigail (mutual Texan and had a mutual friend). It was a really sweet dinner and I'm still benefiting from it!
Dinner at Noah & Lindsey's: This dinner and fellowship was SUPER timely. I was majorly discouraged. When I received Lindsey's reminder, I e-mailed her and just expressed my honest feelings-- that I was struggling with sin and really didn't desire or feel the worth of fellowshipping. She wrote me back an awesome e-mail, encouraging me to come just as I am and that we could go back and do dishes and talk if I needed to have a good cry. That night, I came, we had dinner, and we spent about an hour and a half singing. Everyone who came that night was musical-- so we had all different parts of harmony and a few instruments. It was seriously sweet time. That night opened up my life and their life and now I regularly connect with Lindsey, usually going over after work and just being a part of their life as a family for a few hours.
While Rebekah and I have enjoyed “embracing the parade,” unfortunately it looks as if we are going to be joining the parade in the near future. We are planning to move to Birmingham, AL this fall. The ministry has taken a break the last couple of months, as we seek to transition the management of it to someone else within the church. One thing we’re hoping to do is to build a simple website that will make this much easier to manage going forward. In theory, this would also make it easier for other churches to roll out the same concept. If you’re a tech geek who would like to help with this project, please feel free to contact me.
[Note from Carolyn: Post a comment and I'll forward it to Duncan.]
Privacy, Friends and Facebook
Let me explain. A few months ago, Facebook rolled out facial recognition software and automatically made that option available on all of its customers' profiles--despite any kind of custom privacy levels we had already chosen. Right after that happened, I had a few conversations with some of my local friends (i.e., people I often see in the flesh and not on a screen) about their own preferences in being online. Some don't want to be "Google-able" because of the sensitive nature of their jobs. (There are a lot of those people employed by three-letter agencies in the DC area). Some simply don't want their business known everywhere and don't want to be tagged in photos. And some don't want pictures of their children online.
That made me think through the impact of my choices on their privacy. Because I am an author, speaker, and filmmaker I have chosen to put myself in a more public position, albeit one that barely blips on the celebrity radar screen. When Facebook got started, there wasn't a very good option to separate your personal network from your professional network. As I recall, you could create a fan page and that seemed awkward to me. I couldn't imagine asking someone to become my "fan" instead of my "friend." Eventually, Facebook allowed people to create public pages for their professional efforts. By that point, I already had a jumbled network of people as Facebook friends, some of whom I had never met, some I'd only briefly met, and some whom I really knew and could recognize their names and faces. And my personal updates and pictures of friends and family went out to all of them.
Procrastination won the day for quite some time because I didn't relish having to sort it all out. But after the latest Facebook blunder, I figured I owed it to my flesh-and-blood relationships to do the hard work of paring down my friend network and setting up a public page. I am still in that process. So far, most people have been very gracious about my notice to defriend them and my invitation to join my public page. I am honored by their initial interest in my activities, so I have been slowly writing personal notes to each and every one of them, explaining my reasons. It's a lot of work, but I hope it minimizes any offense. In the end, I'm sure that most people will find what I post on my public page a lot more relevant than the latest pictures of a cookout, kids playing or something else equally mundane in the course of life.
Having a Facebook public page also means that this blog will continue to be the place where I write longer entries. But my public page is likely to be updated more often with quick links and items of interest. I invite you to join that page if you want to be updated more than once every week to ten days -- or whenever I have a thought longer than 400 characters.
Oh, and while I'm explaining my views about online networking, let me also clarify that my Twitter account is primarily about film news and updates. So if you want to know more about the world of Citygate Films, please feel free to follow that. But it might bore you if you're not a hardcore film person. I'm also on LinkedIn, but not very active. Since that is a professional network, I really am selective about connections there. I will only accept links to people I have worked with or know fairly well.
Social media has so many implications for our relationships -- how we use it, when we use it, how it is read, etc. I'd like to hear more from you all how you process these decisions and what biblical concepts have shaped your use of it.
Posted at 04:19 PM in Comments on Our Culture, Relationships, Workplace Issues | Permalink | Comments (4)
| Reblog (0)