This week, Boundless ran a piece titled "Misguided Compassion" by Candice Watters. In it, she writes about singles ministries that are not helping their single adults get married. It is a thought-provoking piece, and because of the questions I've received, I'd like to comment on it.
I consider Candice a friend and I appreciate her thinking. I know she and her husband, Steve, are committed to helping singles marry and to form godly families. And I agree with Candice that the church universal could do a lot more to help its single adults meet and marry. When the institution of the family as God ordained it is under attack from all directions, we in the church must be proactive about caring for marriages, parents, and children. We must also be proactive about helping single adults get married, for certainly this is swimming against the tide of our current culture.
But as this dialogue ensues in various corners of cyberspace, my biggest concern is the pitting of one concept (trusting God) against another (get out there and DO something!). Advocates of either position often paint the perspective of the other in broad strokes. So I'd like to express my appreciation to Candice for raising this topic and then amplify some points in a way I trust will be helpful to both sides.
As Candice writes:
A quick look at the messages coming out of most singles groups, Christian books for singles and singles websites and blogs reveals a common theme:
"If God wants you married," they reason, "He'll make it happen. If you try to make it happen, you'll risk upsetting God's will for your life. Be the best single you can be and leave the rest to Him."
I barely have time to keep up with my own blog and other job responsibilities, so I don't claim to know all that is being published for Christian singles. Candice may be in a better position to comment on the breadth of material out there, but I'd like to examine the potential for some misunderstanding here.
First, as I've said before, I think it is unhelpful to paint this dialogue as an either/or position. It is a both/and position. I firmly believe in the sovereignty of God, so I believe the first sentence is completely true. I would also say the third sentence is generally true, but it could come across as flippant. I would amend it to de-emphasize marital status and highlight God's holy worth by saying, "Be the best disciple you can be and honor God with your trust."
It is the second summary sentence that may be missing some important nuances from among these publications (and I am assuming--without offense--that my own is among this group), so that's the section I want to examine here. I think it is more accurate to say, "But keep a close eye on your life and doctrine. Examine your motivations to discover what your functional beliefs are and what you are truly living for." The emphasis here is on living a God-glorifying existence, married or single. The reason for this is that searching for a mate can easily slip into idolatry. But laziness and passivity also can easily hide under the guise of trusting God. One can be proactive to a proper degree about finding a spouse, but one always needs to vigilant about what's lurking in the heart if a spouse doesn't turn up in the time or manner expected (demanded?) of God. I liken this to the mix of human responsibility and divine sovereignty in the matter of evangelism. I believe Scripture's clear emphasis is on God's sovereignty in saving people, but the Bible also clearly teaches human responsibility in preaching the gospel. So though none of us can actually regenerate another human being, we get out there and share the gospel, we invite our neighbors to outreach events, we serve the poor and needy--and we trust God for the results.
In this same way, whenever I speak at women's ministry events, I encourage the married women in these groups to be proactive about helping the single adults meet and marry. We should trust God for the results, but we should not be passive about creating opportunities for God to work. I'm not speaking of being a busybody--far from it. I'm not talking about going around and stirring up gossip, asking nosy questions of those you don't know, demanding of singles why they are still single when you don't even have a shred of a friendship with them, etc. Instead, I am asking married couples to be proactive in prayer for the singles they know. In many cases, I am asking married couples to actually befriend singles--too often we have an unhelpful marital status divide within the church. I am encouraging married couples to invite singles over for a meal or a social activity in order to create a context for singles to get to know each other. Finally, I encourage married couples to notice the friendships that single men have and ask these men about the women they know. "Have you considered [insert woman's name here] for anything beyond friendship?" is one of the most fruitful questions I know. That question is at the root of many outstanding marriages, as is the encouragement to single women to seriously consider the initiative of a godly man who may not be lighting any sparks on her end. I could fill a book with testimonies of romantic, godly marriages that nearly didn't happen because initially one or the other was not thinking of their future spouse "like that"--at least not until someone they know and respect gently asked why not. (Single adults can do the same thing for each other--I've asked the "why not?" question many times of others--but my observation is that it is far less awkward when a married person is asking. I also think the burden of helping single adults get married should not fall to those of us who are still trying to navigate that rocky path!)
But is a mixer the best solution to this need? I wasn't at the one Candice cited, so I don't know how this particular event was organized. In general, mixers are based upon worldly thinking--they support the self-centered view of "what can I get out of this?" and encourage a superficial evaluation of attractiveness. Fortunately, our God is a merciful God and often works through imperfect plans and imperfect people, so I'm sure several marriages will arise from such a mixer. For that, I am grateful. But before we charge out the door to the next social event, we need to acknowledge that worldliness is more deeply embedded in American evangelicals than we care to admit. That's why I believe we need our churches to clearly reject the individualism and self-centeredness of our culture, especially as it has shaped our relationships, and embrace the servant-minded outlook we find in the New Testament church. Therefore, we need to help single adults evaluate our reasons for why we have the relationships we do.
In recent months, my pastors have been going through a Q&A series on relationships for all the single adults of my church. I appreciate the emphasis they have put on attractiveness. Being attracted to your spouse is a good thing! So for all those who tar God's goodness and generosity with fears of being forced to marry an unattractive spouse, this should come as a relief. But here's the twist: At the top of our lists of what's attractive should be the qualities that God says are attractive--humility, joy, gentleness, hospitality, kindness, fear of the Lord, and so on. It's most unfortunate, but these are qualities not easily or accurately discerned in a mixer setting.
Nevertheless, we are called to cultivate such virtues in ourselves. That's why I wrote an entire book about biblical femininity for single women. It is a tour of most of the Proverbs 31 virtues as they can be applied in singleness. Did I Kiss Marriage Goodbye? Trusting God with a Hope Deferred was meant to address a potentially despairing question with a faith-filled answer. Scripture is full of men and women who tried to fulfill God's will in their own fleshly efforts and failed--just as it is full of those who tried to thwart God's will in their own fleshly efforts and failed. Scripture is a breath-taking panorama of a God who is fully worthy of our complete, childlike trust. We are called to a limited responsibility under the loving, sovereign reign of our Lord. Therefore, we do not need to be anxious about marriage nor be consumed by the goal of getting married.
I want you to be free from anxieties. The unmarried man is anxious about the things of the Lord, how to please the Lord. But the married man is anxious about worldly things, how to please his wife, and his interests are divided. And the unmarried or betrothed woman is anxious about the things of the Lord, how to be holy in body and spirit. But the married woman is anxious about worldly things, how to please her husband. I say this for your own benefit, not to lay any restraint upon you, but to promote good order and to secure your undivided devotion to the Lord. (1 Cor 7:32-35, emphasis mine).
O LORD, my heart is not lifted up;
my eyes are not raised too high;
I do not occupy myself with things
too great and too marvelous for me.
But I have calmed and quieted my soul,
like a weaned child with its mother;
like a weaned child is my soul within me.
O Israel, hope in the LORD
from this time forth and forevermore. (Psalm 131, emphasis mine)
So, yes, I think the church universal should invest in helping single adults navigate the dangerous shoals of unbiblical divorces, immoral and worldly influences, indwelling sin and unbelief, and a myriad other reasons for why it's so hard to get married and stay married. But I'm asking for even more than what Candice outlined--I want much more than mixers. I want radical discipleship that transcends self-centered relationships and calls the Body of Christ to transparent, authentic, New Testament-style life together, each part investing in the other to cultivate a whole-hearted devotion to the Lord.
And for the record, I certainly hope I did not kiss marriage goodbye. So if you know me, feel free to insert my name in the "did you ever consider...?" question. I am not even going to wait for a mixer--I am proactively including the world wide web! ;) But my trust is in my sovereign and loving Father's provision.